Globalism


1. Assumptions

*Analytic units: classes, states, societies, and nonstate actors operate as part of world capitalist system.

*View of actors: international relations viewed from historical perspective, especially the continuous development of world capitalism.

*Behavioral dynamic: focus is on patterns of dominance within and between societies.

*Issues: economic factors are most important. 2. Precursors

*Karl Marx: historical development of capitalism, the proletarian revolution

*John A. Hobson: capitalism leads to imperialism, which brings on structural exploitation.

*V.I. Lenin: imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism

3.    Theories related to the globalism image *Dependency theory

Modernization (industrialization) brings on exploitation and dependency.
The analysis of cases in Latin America *World-system theory

Immanuel Wallerstein’s distinction between “world empire” and “world economy.”

From around 1500 A.D., we have entered the age of the (capitalist) world economy.
Inequalities arise from the division of labor and the distribution of production.



14     E

4. Change

*The idea of cycles (cyclical patterns) in the history of international relations
Structural interpretations of history

The hypothesis of the rise and fall of the great powers

*Changes in the international economy

Changes in the rank or position of actors and regions

Growth and contraction of capitalism *Change in the world capitalist system itself

The role of ideas; the possibility of revolution Socialism as a substitute

New political agenda: a third way?

5. Questions for evaluation

*Can ideas change the world?

*Is there a role for critical theory to play in international relations theory?

*What is the relative weight of the international structures and domestic conditions (state, society, economy) in underdevelopment?

*How can we compare the effects of military, political, economic, and cultural contacts among peoples, states, and regions?

*Can an understanding of “globalism” help us to evaluate contemporary “globalization”?

No comments:

Post a Comment